All these articles should be merged into one, in my opinion. --Crush 15:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

That is right Crush, but it is too early, let the user complete their pages. I think too, it is better they work togehter! I like Adamaix's Spell Guide, because for every spell exist a description, what spell makes. Cotillion has better informations about components and more. And not to forget Blash, he makes a very good introduction about magic and give helpful tips. So I want, that every player can decide self, which guide he likes. --Ginaria 16:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

That's not how a wiki is supposed to be used. You don't see 10 articles by different people on the same subject on Wikipedia, don't you? A wiki is all about collaboration and author ownership is counter-productive. The authors of the magic guide articles should work on one page together instead of working separately and thus duplicating effort. --Crush 14:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

---

Yes, my magic guide is an overview, not a walkthough or cheat sheet. It is simply meant to orient players with the magic system. My article is meant to be "anti-spoiler". If you want to consolidate the different articles, my only desire is that the non-spoiler information be on a separate page (or pages) from the spoiler information. Thanks, and glad you liked it. :) --Blash 00:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm no longer doing much on my sheet except for adding new spells. If you want to merge the guides, feel free to do so, and I agree with Blash keeping keeping two separate pages for guildlines and spoilers. Adamaix 04:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

PS. I like Cotillion's ordering of the spells, its much easier to find a specific spell. So I would recommend following his order then merging my extra content. Adamaix 04:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

sandbox

Thanks to Adamaix, Cotillion, and Blash ^_^ Hoogli 18:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Questions: what does "status icon" mean? Do failed spells still give experience?