(→learning by attributes: - Added my idea to the learning by attributes idea.) |
m (added a comment, sorry it's so long.. :P) |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
*When we would separate magic and special atack system it would be easier for the player to utilize both independently at the same time. Would be an advantage for omni-characters (=bad). | *When we would separate magic and special atack system it would be easier for the player to utilize both independently at the same time. Would be an advantage for omni-characters (=bad). | ||
--[[User:Crush|Crush]] 00:07, 24 February 2008 (CET) | --[[User:Crush|Crush]] 00:07, 24 February 2008 (CET) | ||
===combine the best of these ideas=== | |||
How about using a heavy blend of many of these features? I apologize for leaving such a lengthy comment, but for some reason, I felt it necessary to voice my opinions ''against'' a few of these ideas. If I've omitted any of the listed options, it's probably because I didn't have anything positive to say about it. -[[User:Dabe|Dabe]] 01:46, 25 February 2008 (CET) | |||
====utilization==== | |||
*Physical attack combos would be a lot more fun than the charging method found in SoM. Charging takes too long and the attacks (in SoM) were always ridiculously wild and uncontrollable.. I'd prefer that combos worked more like normal attacks though. Imagine you have finally learned a "2-hit combo" .. now, when you successfully attack a target, your action bar recharges almost instantly, allowing you to follow through, performing your second attack. .. a character who has mastered their weapon-skill might be able to attack 4-6 times in this manner, depending on their fighting style. | |||
*Rage / Limit Breaks are a cool feature, but I don't think everyone should have them. Berserkers would seem to be a good "profession" to fit rage-type skills in to. Rages could have various effects, too.. they could take the simple form of an attack, or a more subtle status effect, like Adrenalize, Haste, etc.. | |||
*To me, the Megaman approach sounds dumb, but its description is reminiscent of magically charged items, like rods and such. Magical ITEMS should work like this, but not a character's actual skills. | |||
*Team formation is neat, but like my prior observation of the Rage / Limit Break concept, it doesn't seem appropriate for the foundation for ALL special attacks. I definitely think it's a cool idea, but only if it's used similarly to Chrono Trigger's dual/triple-techniques, or to a lesser extent like Palom and Porom's Twin Magic, in Final Fantasy 4. | |||
*Completely merging special attacks with magic would surely work, but I dunno.. it seems kind of boring to do it that way. However, you mentioned something about warriors maybe being able to channel mana to perform "super-human" combat abilities. I think that'd be pretty cool, but I don't think it should be the basis for ALL special attacks. Channeling mana for a special attack should typically result in some sort of elemental damage.. like imagine a special attack called "Flamestrike" where a warrior could channel fire through their weapon, during a normal attack. | |||
====acquisition==== | |||
*Learning new abilities simply through level gain is boring and often feels arbitrary. ''"Rydia gains a level!" "Rydia learns FIRE" "Rydia learns ICE" "Rydia learns LIT"'' .. I know we wouldn't be that stupid about it, but I'm sure you get what I mean. | |||
*Using skill trees is my favorite choice, because it maintains some semblance of categorization, based on professions. Skill-trees will help to simulate classes and offer characters job titles, without the use of an actual class system. It also encourages a system where characters have to visit teachers, masters, etc.. in order to learn a new ability. I really dislike the idea of characters "realizing" abilities, without at least some initial instruction. Mastering an ability should require you to hone and practice it, but learning how to use it in the first place, should require some form of instruction.. even if you're reading it out of a book. | |||
*Quests are fine, but it should only be every so often that you feel compelled to perform a quest in exchange for a special ability. Learning an ability as a reward for completing a task should be less common than practicing with a (paid?) trainer. That said, it should be a question of "what are you doing in return, for the sharing of knowledge?" .. paying the teacher their fee, or completing their requested task. | |||
*"Designing" your own attacks does sound pretty bad ass, but I'm not exactly sure how this would work. | |||
*Blue Magic is also cool, but again, like many of these other ideas, it should be just another method among the rest.. and more exotic and unconventional method, at that. Considering how uncommon Blue Magic has been in the FF series, I think we'd be wise to follow suit, if we ever used a similar feature. | |||
*Item-based. I would like to treat "rune slots" like "materia slots" in FF7. In that game, the equipment was geared intentionally toward class-types. Cloud's swords tend to have a very minimal amount of slots, whereas Aerith's staffs commonly have the maximum, or very close to the maximum amount. This way, equipment would help to define the difference between a warrior and magician, where a warrior's equipment typically has very few slots. This would only work well if the rune feature were kept exclusive to magic. | |||
*Attributes are great prerequisites for individual abilities.. I'm having a bit of difficulty imagining the specifics of this feature, but regardless of how it works, I'm in total support of applying attribute requirements to abilities. | |||
..in summation, I think that sticking to a single one of these features, might be a mistake. |
Revision as of 00:46, 25 February 2008
just brainstorming by writing any posibility i can think of without thinking about if it makes sense for us or not
using
Secret of Mana approach
hold attack button to charge. the longer you charge the better the attack when you release it.
- all weapons attacks charge like in Secret of Mana and non-weapon special attacks are Icon selectable
SD3 approach
successful normal attacks charge a combo bar which can be emptied to use a special attack
rage approach
the bar fills when YOU are hit succesfully
usual MMORPG approach
click icon or press hotkey to use special attack. each attack has a cooldown (or not). each use uses up mana (or not).
Street Fighter approach
special attacks are activated by more or less complicated finger acrobatics. they can be used without restrictions but you lose control over the character for the duration of the attack.
Mega Man approach
every special attack has a limited number of uses which can be recharged.
team formation
special attacks can only be used in parties when multiple people cooperate (like standing in a specific formation)
Magic system
Use our magic system for special attacks too, just that damage of special attacks is based on str instead of will -> would make int useful (maybe necessary?) for warriors. RP Explanation: Applied mana energy allows you to perform superhuman combat maneuvers.
obtaining
learning by leveling
reach skill level X and you learn a special attack
skill tree
every skill has an ability tree. you get a skill-specific ability point on each levelup you can spend on a special attack of your choice (passive boni, too)
learning by quest
Do a quest and get teached a new special attack as a reward.
design your own special attacks
players can design their own special attacks within certain limitations
blue mage approach
learn a special attack by getting hit by it (even in PvP???)
item-based
your equipment defines what special attacks can be performed
- integrate special attacks into rune system used for magic?
- maybe different equipment for spellcasting runes and attack runes to differentiate between mage and warrior equipment?
Learning by attributes
Attacks are unlocked by reaching certain attribute prerequisites.
Alternatively they are predefined, but your attribute distribution decides which skill gets unlocked by the levelup of the skill.
results
combo bar approach
I think a combination of the rage and SD3 approach would be good. With that method, both tanks and high agility players will be able to use skills fairly often. As for obtaining, having a skill tree, some gained by quest, and some with items would be a good combination to keep players very interested and inspired i think. -roderic
magic system approach
I am currently favoring to integrate the melee special attacks into the magic system and rune combination seamlessly. One might argue that using int and rune slots for regulating both physical and magical combat reduces the difference between mages and warriors but i think the opposite might be the case:
- Warriors need Dex+Str+Int while mages need Will+Int for maximum damage output so specialisation on one still makes sense.
- Characters have to choose if they want to use their resources (int-based mana flow and rune slots) for physical or magical combat. The logical choice would be to concentrate on one to be able to benefit from attribute specialisation.
- When we would separate magic and special atack system it would be easier for the player to utilize both independently at the same time. Would be an advantage for omni-characters (=bad).
--Crush 00:07, 24 February 2008 (CET)
combine the best of these ideas
How about using a heavy blend of many of these features? I apologize for leaving such a lengthy comment, but for some reason, I felt it necessary to voice my opinions against a few of these ideas. If I've omitted any of the listed options, it's probably because I didn't have anything positive to say about it. -Dabe 01:46, 25 February 2008 (CET)
utilization
- Physical attack combos would be a lot more fun than the charging method found in SoM. Charging takes too long and the attacks (in SoM) were always ridiculously wild and uncontrollable.. I'd prefer that combos worked more like normal attacks though. Imagine you have finally learned a "2-hit combo" .. now, when you successfully attack a target, your action bar recharges almost instantly, allowing you to follow through, performing your second attack. .. a character who has mastered their weapon-skill might be able to attack 4-6 times in this manner, depending on their fighting style.
- Rage / Limit Breaks are a cool feature, but I don't think everyone should have them. Berserkers would seem to be a good "profession" to fit rage-type skills in to. Rages could have various effects, too.. they could take the simple form of an attack, or a more subtle status effect, like Adrenalize, Haste, etc..
- To me, the Megaman approach sounds dumb, but its description is reminiscent of magically charged items, like rods and such. Magical ITEMS should work like this, but not a character's actual skills.
- Team formation is neat, but like my prior observation of the Rage / Limit Break concept, it doesn't seem appropriate for the foundation for ALL special attacks. I definitely think it's a cool idea, but only if it's used similarly to Chrono Trigger's dual/triple-techniques, or to a lesser extent like Palom and Porom's Twin Magic, in Final Fantasy 4.
- Completely merging special attacks with magic would surely work, but I dunno.. it seems kind of boring to do it that way. However, you mentioned something about warriors maybe being able to channel mana to perform "super-human" combat abilities. I think that'd be pretty cool, but I don't think it should be the basis for ALL special attacks. Channeling mana for a special attack should typically result in some sort of elemental damage.. like imagine a special attack called "Flamestrike" where a warrior could channel fire through their weapon, during a normal attack.
acquisition
- Learning new abilities simply through level gain is boring and often feels arbitrary. "Rydia gains a level!" "Rydia learns FIRE" "Rydia learns ICE" "Rydia learns LIT" .. I know we wouldn't be that stupid about it, but I'm sure you get what I mean.
- Using skill trees is my favorite choice, because it maintains some semblance of categorization, based on professions. Skill-trees will help to simulate classes and offer characters job titles, without the use of an actual class system. It also encourages a system where characters have to visit teachers, masters, etc.. in order to learn a new ability. I really dislike the idea of characters "realizing" abilities, without at least some initial instruction. Mastering an ability should require you to hone and practice it, but learning how to use it in the first place, should require some form of instruction.. even if you're reading it out of a book.
- Quests are fine, but it should only be every so often that you feel compelled to perform a quest in exchange for a special ability. Learning an ability as a reward for completing a task should be less common than practicing with a (paid?) trainer. That said, it should be a question of "what are you doing in return, for the sharing of knowledge?" .. paying the teacher their fee, or completing their requested task.
- "Designing" your own attacks does sound pretty bad ass, but I'm not exactly sure how this would work.
- Blue Magic is also cool, but again, like many of these other ideas, it should be just another method among the rest.. and more exotic and unconventional method, at that. Considering how uncommon Blue Magic has been in the FF series, I think we'd be wise to follow suit, if we ever used a similar feature.
- Item-based. I would like to treat "rune slots" like "materia slots" in FF7. In that game, the equipment was geared intentionally toward class-types. Cloud's swords tend to have a very minimal amount of slots, whereas Aerith's staffs commonly have the maximum, or very close to the maximum amount. This way, equipment would help to define the difference between a warrior and magician, where a warrior's equipment typically has very few slots. This would only work well if the rune feature were kept exclusive to magic.
- Attributes are great prerequisites for individual abilities.. I'm having a bit of difficulty imagining the specifics of this feature, but regardless of how it works, I'm in total support of applying attribute requirements to abilities.
..in summation, I think that sticking to a single one of these features, might be a mistake.