m (Jesusalva moved page Talk:Magic to Revolt talk:Magic without leaving a redirect: Convention) |
|||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
All these articles should be merged into one, in my opinion. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] 15:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | All these articles should be merged into one, in my opinion. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] 15:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
That is right Crush, but it is too early, let the user complete their pages. I think too, it is better they work togehter! I like Adamaix's Spell Guide, because for every spell exist a description, what spell makes. Cotillion has better informations about components and more. And not to forget Blash, he makes a very good introduction about magic and give helpful tips. So I want, that every player can decide self, which guide he likes. --[[User:Ginaria|Ginaria]] 16:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | :That is right Crush, but it is too early, let the user complete their pages. I think too, it is better they work togehter! I like Adamaix's Spell Guide, because for every spell exist a description, what spell makes. Cotillion has better informations about components and more. And not to forget Blash, he makes a very good introduction about magic and give helpful tips. So I want, that every player can decide self, which guide he likes. --[[User:Ginaria|Ginaria]] 16:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
::That's not how a wiki is supposed to be used. You don't see 10 articles by different people on the same subject on Wikipedia, don't you? A wiki is all about collaboration and author ownership is counter-productive. The authors of the magic guide articles should work on one page together instead of working separately and thus duplicating effort. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] 14:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
My article | Yes, my magic guide is an overview, not a walkthough or cheat sheet. It is simply meant to orient players with the magic system. My article is meant to be "''anti-spoiler''". If you want to consolidate the different articles, my only desire is that the non-spoiler information be on a separate page (or pages) from the spoiler information. Thanks, and glad you liked it. :) --[[User:Blash|Blash]] 00:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Well, I'm no longer doing much on my sheet except for adding new spells. If you want to merge the guides, feel free to do so, and I agree with Blash keeping keeping two separate pages for guildlines and spoilers. [[User:Adamaix|Adamaix]] 04:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
PS. I like Cotillion's ordering of the spells, its much easier to find a specific spell. So I would recommend following his order then merging my extra content. [[User:Adamaix|Adamaix]] 04:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
==sandbox== | |||
Thanks to Adamaix, Cotillion, and Blash ^_^ [[User:Hoogli|Hoogli]] 18:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Questions: what does "status icon" mean? Do failed spells still give experience? | |||
I've cleared up the initial guide on how to use magic. In my opinion, it was far too vague and also left out some details. I'd also like to start adding pages of individual different things (such as the mana seed) so that a user can look up more concrete information on that given item. [[User:Hgecko|Hgecko]] 03:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:39, 31 January 2023
All these articles should be merged into one, in my opinion. --Crush 15:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- That is right Crush, but it is too early, let the user complete their pages. I think too, it is better they work togehter! I like Adamaix's Spell Guide, because for every spell exist a description, what spell makes. Cotillion has better informations about components and more. And not to forget Blash, he makes a very good introduction about magic and give helpful tips. So I want, that every player can decide self, which guide he likes. --Ginaria 16:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- That's not how a wiki is supposed to be used. You don't see 10 articles by different people on the same subject on Wikipedia, don't you? A wiki is all about collaboration and author ownership is counter-productive. The authors of the magic guide articles should work on one page together instead of working separately and thus duplicating effort. --Crush 14:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes, my magic guide is an overview, not a walkthough or cheat sheet. It is simply meant to orient players with the magic system. My article is meant to be "anti-spoiler". If you want to consolidate the different articles, my only desire is that the non-spoiler information be on a separate page (or pages) from the spoiler information. Thanks, and glad you liked it. :) --Blash 00:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, I'm no longer doing much on my sheet except for adding new spells. If you want to merge the guides, feel free to do so, and I agree with Blash keeping keeping two separate pages for guildlines and spoilers. Adamaix 04:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
PS. I like Cotillion's ordering of the spells, its much easier to find a specific spell. So I would recommend following his order then merging my extra content. Adamaix 04:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
sandbox
Thanks to Adamaix, Cotillion, and Blash ^_^ Hoogli 18:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Questions: what does "status icon" mean? Do failed spells still give experience?
I've cleared up the initial guide on how to use magic. In my opinion, it was far too vague and also left out some details. I'd also like to start adding pages of individual different things (such as the mana seed) so that a user can look up more concrete information on that given item. Hgecko 03:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
