(Suggestion: change CSS) |
m (Jaxad0127 moved page Talk:Developers to Dev talk:Developers) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
✎ [[User:Kess|Kess]]<sup>[[User talk:Kess|☽]]</sup> 12:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | ✎ [[User:Kess|Kess]]<sup>[[User talk:Kess|☽]]</sup> 12:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Hm. Now when only the core devs is (should be) mentioned, perhaps this is more appropriate: | |||
{| class="sortable" style="width:100%; padding:5px; border-bottom:2px solid #efdead;" | |||
|- style="background:#efdead; align:left;" | |||
! Name !! IRC nick !! Forum nick !! Occupation !! Location | |||
|- | |||
| [[User:Bjørn|Bjørn Lindeijer]] || b_lindeijer || Bjørn || Lead programmer || The Netherlands | |||
|} | |||
:I also removed the location from the contributors page, since it’s not really relevant in my ''humble'' opinion (further, many had no location given, it would be a heck to keep those locations given up-to-date, and why we even should keep track of many former contributors’ locations...). ✎ [[User:Kess|Kess]]<sup>[[User talk:Kess|☽]]</sup> 02:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Split between contributors and active developers== | |||
I like to see 2 wikiarticles, one with all the active developers and one with the contributors. In the list with active developers, all developers with git access, and/or have an (active) important role with the project. All the other people (retired, contributed only 1 thing etc) on the list with the contributors. [[User:EJlol|EJ]] 13:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
: I like this idea very much! Perhaps then the current [[Developers]] page is for the “VIPs†and [[Contributors]] for the rest? In a similar vein the in-game help (F1) needs to be updated, and then there is all those AUTHORS files in the source... ✎ [[User:Kess|Kess]]<sup>[[User talk:Kess|☽]]</sup> 14:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: I’ve just made this split. So, please consider fixing the css as mentioned in the section above. Also, the non-core developers need to be removed from this article, I’m not up to that task. ✎ [[User:Kess|Kess]]<sup>[[User talk:Kess|☽]]</sup> 02:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 July 2013
Sortable tables
Well, since the MediaWiki software has been upgraded, sortable tables work out-of-the-box. I propose that the CSS be updated with .odd
and .even
class formats similar to Template:Dev1 and Template:Dev2, rendering the two templates obsolete (at least in their current format). With this wiki editors doesn’t have to change every row of dev1
and dev2
any longer.
Name | Occupation | Location |
---|---|---|
Av3nger | Pixel art, map creation, translations | Brazil |
Bertram | Programmer | France |
Andreas Habel (Exceptionfault) | Programmer | Germany |
✎ Kess☽ 12:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hm. Now when only the core devs is (should be) mentioned, perhaps this is more appropriate:
Name | IRC nick | Forum nick | Occupation | Location |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bjørn Lindeijer | b_lindeijer | Bjørn | Lead programmer | The Netherlands |
- I also removed the location from the contributors page, since it’s not really relevant in my humble opinion (further, many had no location given, it would be a heck to keep those locations given up-to-date, and why we even should keep track of many former contributors’ locations...). ✎ Kess☽ 02:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Split between contributors and active developers
I like to see 2 wikiarticles, one with all the active developers and one with the contributors. In the list with active developers, all developers with git access, and/or have an (active) important role with the project. All the other people (retired, contributed only 1 thing etc) on the list with the contributors. EJ 13:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- I like this idea very much! Perhaps then the current Developers page is for the “VIPs†and Contributors for the rest? In a similar vein the in-game help (F1) needs to be updated, and then there is all those AUTHORS files in the source... ✎ Kess☽ 14:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)